>>45504552>If Gamefreak dosen't make the models then don't blame Gamefreak for not making making modelsYou were the first one on this thread to bring up Gamefreak as the maker of the models. You're just defending yourself against your made up quote.
>Pokemon the brand is whats making money not the games.So, gamefreak not having a 100 billion dollars means they don't have the money to add things that single modders manage to add on an afternoon?
>you can't just hire more people to increase production speed.If you have enough money, you can make a company bigger in many ways, and you can also invest the money on making the quality of the product better.
The thing is that is cheaper to make your product with less quality if the buyers of your product don't care about quality and always defend it blindly.
>creating new textures for not only the hundreds of pokemon, but every other asset in this game would definitely take more than just a couple days.Look at this pic. A decent art department could do 200 of these "edits" in a couple of days, that's what it would take to finish the national dex.
Also, let's not forget the rest of the assets had nintendo64-tier textures anyways.
t. 3D modeler.
>Reused assets are a common practice everywhereThat doesn't make them good.
>none of the reused animations look terrible That doesn't make them good.
>You sound like someone who would eat dogshit if you though it would piss off "the shills">no u 
