>>46478203If you are so confident that graphics are the most important thing, What if I made a game with little amounts of content, little to do, shit story, and shit gameplay, slow as shit loading screens, but have the best graphics of all time?
Do you want to know why no mans sky is such shit, and had a low steam rating? It's because of the long ass loading time, and they were more focused on making the game look pretty, rather than making the game fun. That's part of the reason why cyberpunk 2077 sucked so much dick.
So in summary, I would rather play a game with shit graphics, but it's fun, and has a lot for you to do rather than a game with good graphics, but not fun at all, and shit content.
