>>46518807M-My dude ... You know more people can respond to you, right? It's not like I have a monopoly on replying to you, but wojak poster makes me laugh, so I'll leave it at that.
>make an organization for people with similar beliefs equals making a dogmatic institution of worshipers of a nonexistenceDude, you're going nowhere with this. Even you know that's not worship, adulation, idolizing, revering, etc. Give the point up there.
>One man rapes; therefore, all men rape.Nope.
>not worship, just support a little bit. You know, like agree with them 'n stuff.You have no clue what atheists do, do you? Adding "reverently" is also a point I'd argue, but you'd just say it was the wrong word and change it to "friendly" or something that waters your original point down to nothing, anyway.
>No, we don't. the fuck?Oh, boy, do you have some research to do. Well, you'll learn a lot along the way.
>lolTime to look at some opposing views, anon. Get ready for what the opposite side has to say.
>deliberately fictional myth ...Both maintain the exact same impossible features. Their "vague" or "clear" origin is irrelevant to whether they can or cannot exist. You don't need to know that Santa was made up to know he was fake. Few people know the exact person who thought of the myth, but that is irrelevant as to whether a man can fly on reindeer.
>You really have troubleOh, shut up. There's no such trouble, Gish galloping, etc, stop being dramatic. Have a good night either way, and remember kids, anyone can reply to you on 4channel.
