I'm gonna rate posts with no replies for the hell of it.
>>47223446Your taste is certainly unique, but for the most part i don't find it very good. Tangela and Chandelure are the only nest Pokemon in your top 5. Mad props for having Flamenco Oricorio there, though. Trevenant, Malamar and Falinks are great too. The rest is inconsistent. 5/10
>>47224231That top 3 is abominable, but there's a lot to love in the rest of the top 15. Barring Braixen, most of the other choices are actually pretty good. 6.5/10 (actually a great list, but the top 3 brings it down a lot)
>>47229920Your faves are all either Cool or Cute with no in-between, but admittedly the choices are great regardless of the fact. Also nice to see a lot of mid evos, especially some of the best ones. Overall one of the best lists here despite being slightly more generic and one-note. 9/10
>>47232658>Dusclopsfag is retardedMany such cases!
>>47234913You're right about it being plain. Even as a bugfag myself, I've never understood the love for Heracross. Bug type has so many visually eye catching and cool as hell picks that i genuinely get confused at how many people go for this bog-standard and boringly plain Rhino Beetle as their choice. The rest is alright. Some hits, some misses. Overall plain as you said. 6/10
>>47235350Ivysaur love is always welcome, but worst legendary bird appearing not once, but twice on the list is a big miss. The rest is pretty scattershot, but mostly good. 7.5/10
