>>47512869I just don't get what is repulsive about this
>>47503100 for example. It's a cute looking art with nicely drawn and colored foot. Nothing disgusting like sweat, smells, dirt, yellow toenails, wrinkles etc., and the foot doesn't cover half the image. How can a footfag not like this and say it's deviantart level and disgusting? You could complain about subtlety, but as I said, soles can't be subtle. For simple feet pics, you can sometimes say "oh she just happens to be barefoot" but when the soles are showing then it's screaming that the artist has the fetish.
