>>48821290lets just ignore the fetishists for a second.
you're claiming to know intent. you can't know intent. its impossible to guess what intent there was unless you have a document from them saying what their intent was. i'm not going to sit here and demand SAUCE on everything, but by asserting that their intent was something, you're claiming that you have this information. which i know you don't because its not a statement that gamefreak would make as it would be business suicide, and pokemon is such a large piece of media that there are enough chefs in the kitchen that any individual intent becomes irrelevant
secondly, as one of those degenerates who would absolutely raise a lewd, big booba gardevoir and submit her to my weird fetishes, you don't need to pander to me, and corporations shouldn't. my degenerate mind will bridge gaps where i need them. have you ever written a 5 page post on why gardevoirs could plausibly have large breasts? because i have.
in fact, pandering to me directly may actually make it less fun as those gaps are what make it fun. so if they are as degenerate as you claim to be, to the point where they would pander to degenerates like myself, they would know that it wouldn't do any good to do so any money i would pay to give my gardevoir a collar in a pokemon game they'd lose so much more business from that sort of thing becoming 'canon' and it scaring away children and their parent's wallets.
in short, your assertion is both fallacious and irrational
