>>49594470>traded pokemon would be instantly barred from thisBut most people who inject use bots to trade them their 'mons anyway. Out of the injecting community, it's probably less than 10% who actually physically inject into modded switches themselves.
>banned from switch online forever>lose access to their $300 dollar machineThere's a big difference between losing access to switch online, and having your console bricked. Losing access to online that you're potentially paying monthly for is insignificant, especially when a new account can be made in minutes. Like I said before, Nintendo allowing GF the authority to brick consoles is very unlikely. Even if they did, $300 dollars
(lol, still don't know why you felt the need to put $ and spell the word)
is not a lot of money to a poketuber who is getting rich off of distribution videos and bots. They'd pop back up very quickly.
I don't think you're suggesting any kind of philosophy that GF wouldn't have already considered and actioned years ago, were it possible.
It's definitely not an easy problem for them to solve.
One answer might be to totally overthrow the system they use for creating pokemon, putting a spanner in the works for teams like PKHex, and then developing safeguards to try and prevent future manipulation. However, that would be throwing away years of work on their part, and I don't see GF doing it.
