>>49909476>You base your impressions of the franchise on shit you read on the Internet, not actual text in official sources. You can't suddenly change your method.I've only replied to you twice, so you're clearly confusing me with someone else.
>It does, you're not able to understand the game yet because you need to be able to read, the games themselves say this.Yes, the games have more recently said they are egg shaped cradles, not once did I deny this wasn't the case, I said the naming convention was a poor one, because then they have to go into extra exposition and dialogue in order to discuss said thing.
>But you are the headcanonfag.Again, greentexting is not an argument, actually formulate your sentences and explain how I am a headcanonfag.
>Those "some" adults compose a majority of the pokemon fanbase.Yes, and some of those adults do not. Pokemon is the biggest franchise in the world, stop assuming that every adult that plays it is autistic or can't read.
>Have you seen the shape they have? When Elm obtained the first one he wasn't even sure that a mon would come out.Yes, they're shaped like eggs. Again, egg shaped cradle is an apt term for said thing, calling them actual eggs however is not an apt term.
>First, don't pretend you care about language.I clearly care more than you.
>Second, all issues have been addressed in text in the zukan and the games. They're supposed to be strange things the human characters in the setting don't know much about. Hence the dude telling you that they're cradles acting as if he's revealing you something.They're really not strange things. They're egg shaped cradles, they've made that abundantly clear at this point. They are not traditional cradles by any means in terms of what a human would typically use, but as for Pokemon, they are clearly cradles shaped like eggs. Again, call them Cradles.
You're really not formulating any arguments in your favor here other than "You can't read, I'm right, stop it ree."
