>>49964614You are the only person who raised the spectre of pedantry and definitions by insisting that you were right and insulting your interlocutor. It doesn't matter how long it took you to post the definition. Let me be clear, this is not about politeness; it's about three mutually dependent issues.
1) You were wrong about the absolute rightness and universality of this definition, because it is an abstract description of numerous acts and dispositions and its usage is by no means clear in all cases.
2) Because of 1), you should've understood that the initial misunderstanding was not out of malice nor did it necessitate any correction, only an explanation of what you actually meant.
3) Because of 1), you also should've understood that, should you wish to continue the conversation, a good faith reply would be to simply rephrase your thoughts in such a way that would open a discussion, perhaps about different ways to serve your Goddess that pleased you.
