>>50145301>>50145430>How?In the first half of the game, players at the time were unfamiliar with the new Pokemon, putting them on the same playing field and insuring that everyone was experiencing a very specific game. After, they could introduce more old Pokemon which play differently anyway because of the new moveset options they got in this game.
>So? You didn't actually disprove that XY has more and better repeatable content.You asked a qualitative question, not a quantitative one. In addition, XY lacks BW's WiFi mode at the Battle Subway/Masion, so there's a whole other quantity you're missing. Of course you left out Multis in both games, so I guess you just didn't play them.
>How is there a teambuilding challenge when there's practically zero punishment for losing?The challenge comes from having to make the team within the limitations of the Type Master tournaments in the first place.
>How is it a challenge when it doesn't even cap levels?The challenge is moving from point A to point B, hence the navigational thing I mentioned.
>How is following a script a puzzle?Did you try to get any of the cult endings?
>Glad we agree XY is objectively better.In what ways? XY has more 3D, which if you want more 2D BW is objectively better. If you like EXP scaling, BW is objectively better. If you hate faries, BW is objectively better. If you don't like getting EXP for catching Pokemon, BW is objectively better. I could go on, but how about this. ORAS is objectively better at the Battle Masion, online aspects, StreetPass integration, and Mega count. Subjectively, I also like ORAS better than XY for those reasons. Basically, ORAS is the objectively better Gen 6 game, but if I want to play a Gen 5 game then BW or B2W2 are objectively Gen 5 games and XY isn't so it loses there too.
>Read my posts.I did, how is my opinion invalid.
