>>50426779>>50426829If you think the ratio between employers and willing employees is 1:1 you're just retarded. When a new baby is born, nobody creates a new job opening for that person. There are about 100 applicants per any imaginable job. That's the math of the situation. Rest is just cope. I'm also not American and live in one of the smallest nations in the world, we basically all take turns being in the same company like it was a national glory hole.
>hurr durr ur just lazy despite applying for jobs constantlyThis is just incredibly offensive and barely deserves a response.
>You're telling me that there are absolutely no companies hiring plumbers or locksmiths or cooksGuess what faggot, I'm not a cook, plumber or a locksmith. I have one (1) trade and I have to compete in that field and that field alone. I do see job openings for cooks and plumbers all the time but I am not one and will never become one. Naturally I refuse to get more degrees because that's fucking retarded and having to have several professions to land a low level job would just prove my point about society getting worse by the day. Which it is.
>People have been saying "in this economy" for literal decadesProbably because the standing of a regular worker bloke is worse every year and companies try to manage with fewer and fewer employees. If you had ever held a job in your life you would know that your boss is always trying to make you do the work of 3 people.
