>>52843530>Yes they do lmao. ... No one wants to be kept in a cageThis happens in zoos that fail to accommodate their animals properly and is seen as a problem, not a standard everyone tries to adhere to.
And even then it's still better than the wild, where you can just get murdered by a predator/competitor, starve to death or get a random infection and croak.
>>52843588>White people always thinking every thing wants to be trapped in a cage in exchange for free food.You thinking that zoos haven't evolved from 19th century "animal in a tiny cage" model just shows that you don't know what you're talking about.
>>52843557>You don't have to compete for anything in prisonJust one sentence in and you've already proving yourself to be an idiot who knows absolutely nothing about what he's talking about.
>I don't see you rushing to live a life without competingNo fucking shit, dumbass. The point of the prison is to PUNISH you by restricting your freedom of movement, choice and activities. You get food and housing for free, sure, but none of it is good, comfortable and enjoyable, you get minimal or no entertainment and you have to share place with tons of shitty and dangerous people.
Zoos, or at least proper ones, aren't built to torment animals, but to provide them with comfortable existence (which in turn leads to profit, because nobody wants to look at a depressed animal that does fuck all).
>You are a fucking clown if you think you aren't in competition right now. And your reading comprehension is dogshit. I haven't said that free human life doesn't have completion at any point in my post (no fucking shit it does). What I did say is that zoos don't have it, as opposed to the existence in the wild for animals, and it makes it objectively better for animals unless it's a shitty 19th century tier zoo that is just a bunch of shitty cages.
And I also said that prison analogy is crap because prison is objectively worse that freedom.
