>>53769176new and improved
got rid of the autism for once so that I could showcase the Pokémon I truly love as opposed to a bunch that I really like and only a few I love
if something appears twice, it's because it beat out every other mon in its type for being the favorite
I didn't want to put anything for the gen 3 starters because they're all amazing and you can't make me choose, but Swampert has the most consistently-good line (by the tiniest inch, might I add) so it got a spot as Hoenn's overall ambassador>OP's charthonestly I don't agree with most of your choices, but the few I do agree with make me respect you so I don't mind
>>53769274clearly a penguin enjoyer (based), with pretty eccentric and respectable taste otherwise
>>53769297you have an incredibly specific aura about you that I cannot place
good chart even if I disagree with a lot of it
>>53769318very good
unfortunately you like Squawkabilly so I cannot agree with you as much as I could've
>>53769324decent chart, I agree with a lot of it but not with other parts, how are you the first person i've seen to put Primal Kyogre as a favorite
>>53769438you type like my grandad and that endears me to you despite our differing tastes
I'm with you in hating a lot of the newer designs (against my will ;-;), even if what we define as "newer" seems to differ greatly
>>53769922yeah, I tried to avoid megas for kalos too but I really can't help it because a lot of them are quite cool. With megas it's like you either love or hate them: there's almost no in-between.
Stuff like most of the mega Ghost-types, Mega Beedrill, Mega Sceptile, Mega Mawile- all of that is so insanely cool that it easily destroys a lot of Kalos' (meager) selection of Pokémon in a competition. Meanwhile stuff like Mega Charizard X, Mega Aerodactyl, or Mega Glalie makes all its competition look better by comparison because it's just such dogshit. 'tis quite the dilemma
