>>53820517there's no such thing, or at least there wasn't back in the day, as "prudefags". They, if they can be identified as such, are a new convention here on the blue boards, here on /vp/ in specific. It's true that there were always horny threads, even back in the day. But "prudefags" would be a reactionary schism of younger or newer members who find the "default" culture of the board to be too horny, because somehow social engineering is steering in the direction of anti-horny, let alone hedonism etc, and on a contrarian whim, engage every horny thread with hostility. I am an oldfag, from 2008, I have been on 4chan since the horniest of the horny days of /b/, but I also enjoy a relatively harmless discussion like those found on /co/ /vp/ etc. I can like both smut and cool threads can't I?
Because when you turn everything into a "coomer vs prude" war even threads that didnt need to be involved get sucked in, as is happening here.
