>>53904179>you couldn’t tell apart the sneaky fake votes.They were fairly obvious desu. Even so, in a poll with a few hundred votes, a handful of trolls would need to submit dozens of (convincing) forms to hope to change the outcome. Basic statistics, outliers don't influence the results much if you have a large enough data pool. And though polls on 4chan aren't an exact science, the fact that the outcome is largely in line with previous years' polls makes it fairly reliable as to gauging /vp/'s tastes.
>Never met such an incompetent attention whore tourist here.>Literally anyone could do a better job than you running a poll.I'm not the guy who made the poll, I just wrote a quick formula to count the votes. Why don't you make a poll if you think it'd be more representative? Not trolling or insulting, I'm genuinely curious to see if you'd have a better method.
