>>54257982>muh word gamesThat's a fun way to say "facts"
>because it just does!Correct. Affirmative action does not incentives firing at all, no one has been displaced. That's not how it works.
>You can't fathom why some random worker that would have nothing without the organisation of a corporation gets paid less than the person in chargeWrong, actually. The person in charge would have nothing without the workers. If the workers didn't have corpos choking them out of business, they would be their own business owners. It's a known and objective fact that walmarts crush small businesses when they move in. So workers would be fine without billionaires, and billionaires NEED workers or they have nothing. The only reason billionaires exist is because they strangle out any competition with their size, and then exploit workers by cutting wages/benefits and pay themselves bonuses. You objectively can't be a billionaire without exploitation because if you paid your workers fairly you wouldn't have enough to pay yourself the billions in bonuses.
>passove aggressiveThere's literally nothing passive about any of my posts. I'm just calling you a retard, thays just aggressive, not passive. Go ahead and call that a word game too, so you can keep hiding from being wrong.
