>>54343113>>54343125I expected you to look to transcendent values. the value of money is arbitrary, we can end up with zimbabwe denominations and have 10 milliion not not get much. though you seem to assume that the wealthy actually have that much in liquid cash. they don't, the ultra wealthy own properties, organizations, land, mining rights, art pieces and company stock. it's all assets. a recent example, when musk bought twitter, he had to sell off Tesla stock to do so. that is because despite being a billionaire, he didn't have millions or billions in cash.
this is true with all of them and why you find articles claiming some of them aren't billionaires, because the value of things they own fluctuates.
on the nukes part, how do you force people to live simple if you also live simply? I like the concept, the shire with just internet is paradice to me, but tech advances fast when society has protections of individual freedoms, you wouldn't be able to enforce that if the right to ownership. personal and private property are the same thing on an different, yet easily manipulated scale.
