>>54548470I've seen that one before. The body itself doesn't really bother me, but the head and face definitely do.
Hate the clown aesthetic its going for. The mohawk hair wouldn't be bad on its own, but paired with the face yeah you can definitely see the human-likeness of it.
Pic rel is one I've liked for a good while, but I can see what you mean. Aside from the legs, I guess it does lend itself into the barafag-side. But does its non-humanlike face make up for it, or still too barafag/furfag?
>>54548489>>54548498Hi there. No, definitely not commissioning them. IMO that's a massive waste of money.
So Mightyena is one of my favorite Pokemon, and I would like to see it get an evolution. Preferably a cross-gen evo, but a regional form evo could work too if done right.
When just looking around at fan-made evolutions for the line, I tend to save my favorites and post them in appropriate threads. I've done it with other Pokemon, too.
Many artists, for whatever reason, tend to make bipedal evolutions for Mightyena. A lot of people bash on them simply for being bipedal and "Too close to furfaggotry."
Honestly, one reason why I post this is for conversations like I've had with
>>54546637I'm interested in their mindset. What makes a Pokemon/Fakemon furbait/barabait? What is acceptable, what stretches things too far.
I don't like furfags because romanticizing and fetishizing animals, real or fake, is disgusting and wrong.
But I don't necessarily believe making a werewolf or gnoll-like design, for Mightyena or any other Pokemon, means has "furry undertones"
