>>54779064Can you please go back to school and learn how to speak English. You’re also hysterical by the way, the shit you’re coming out with is so out of touch.
>They have studied it.Who is they, who were the subjects? Cause it very much feels pretty fucking common considering for generations we had men dating women 20 - 30 years younger than them and in a lot of past instances actual 13 year olds.
Attraction to pubescent age is not the same as pedophilia, if you’re going to pull facts. Once any animal is capable of reproduction, the species is technically supposed to find attraction to it and reproduce. We are NOT above this. Like I said, it’s multilayered already in reality. When you throw in cartoon characters you’re only adding more layers to it.
Pretty weird how lolicon, jailbait, stepsister porn etc is all super popular. Ah, but no, only 5% of the population is like that. Pretty weird when every male I’ve ever known has lusted after teen girls and lolis and don’t give a shit unless they’re trying to repress to not be a target of shame.
I’m not saying there aren’t pedophiles and that this subject and all these pictures may not still fall under that umbrella. But not all fingers are thumbs.
On occasion, I want to shoot ropes to some drawn pubescent boys. If by chance I popped a boner to a real boy, Im also not gonna feel bad about it. For context, when I say that I am a person who needs pubic hair and signs of maturing. Toddlercon etc you can absolutely dunk on for being pedophilic. But you need to actually go and google what pedophilia actually is because it seems like you don’t know.
Attraction to minors at any level is not the same as attraction to prepubescent children. Not all minors are prepubescent and not all minors are pubescent. Being attracted to a 11 year old with pubic hair and semen production is actually different to being attracted to a 8 year old.
