>>54856549No they don't, you only get actual time differences in direct sequels (Kanto to Johto and BW to B2W2) Pokemon is a multiverse so there is no consistency between games.
Multiple neutral natures is something related to what they did when they first introduced natures just random value 1 (Positive nature) and random value 2 (Negative nature), if they are both the same +att -att you get the first of the neutral natures, if it's +def -def from a human perspective that's exactly the same but for a programming point of view (expecially in early 2000 and considering that GF was never good at programming) that's different, and that's why we have 5 neutral natures (and there never was hidden power fairy)
>But they could change that now couldn't they?Yes but they don't give a fuck, not gonna bother on that stuff
>>54856577Eevee only had new evolutions added in games where lot of Pokemon had new evo (2° and 4° gen) not gonna go into detail on that but I suppose you could see why those two in particular.
Then Sylveon came, that's because X and Y were games SPECIFICALLY catered to be nostalgia bait, with Kalos actually being Kanto 2, megas and a new eevolution top cherry top all that, right now Pokemon is in a peak and hype season so there is no need for a new eevee evo, the instant sales go even slightly down you can be sure that a new eevolution will come out (alongside charizard and mewtwo most likely)
Ditto and meltan have nothing in common
>>54857019Coding error, it just skips everything between the damage and the calculated secondary damage (that being life orb dmg as well as other items like eject button)
>>54857291Around 95-100 is "good" but base stats are not the only thing a Pokemon need to be good, take silvally (all 95) and those mythicals with all 100.
Amoongus is one of the strongest most consistent Pokemon since its introduction and it barely has a single "high" stat (114 hp)
(This Is obviously considering VGC not smogon's fan metas)
