[80 / 5 / 46]
Quoted By: >>54955488 >>54955500 >>54955556 >>54955571 >>54956063 >>54956197 >>54956285 >>54956355 >>54956906 >>54957296 >>54957336 >>54957795 >>54959359 >>54964105 >>54965133 >>54965440
>Nuclear level take
The games need a lot less focus on combat and battling. Im not saying we need more retarded minigames like pokemon amie or camp but there should be a lot more simulation aspects and ecology and adventure/problem solving in pokemon games. The combat has been stale and outdated since like ruby/saphire and its not gotten any more interesting since then, its especially apparent during the campaign how boring this 4 menu option 4 move set 1 action per turn 1 active pokemon system is. Other people think maybe there should be action commands like mario or skill trees like other rpgs or multi monster battles etc
WRONG
all these solutions are stupid because they want to fix the combat when the real solution is to have less of it. pokemon combat is extremely time consuming, its not satisfying, they are glorified cutscenes at this point.
The games need a lot less focus on combat and battling. Im not saying we need more retarded minigames like pokemon amie or camp but there should be a lot more simulation aspects and ecology and adventure/problem solving in pokemon games. The combat has been stale and outdated since like ruby/saphire and its not gotten any more interesting since then, its especially apparent during the campaign how boring this 4 menu option 4 move set 1 action per turn 1 active pokemon system is. Other people think maybe there should be action commands like mario or skill trees like other rpgs or multi monster battles etc
WRONG
all these solutions are stupid because they want to fix the combat when the real solution is to have less of it. pokemon combat is extremely time consuming, its not satisfying, they are glorified cutscenes at this point.
