>>54981246>Yes, they are basically animals mentally. They are subhuman.>mentallyWe are inventing new terms. Now you can be human, but either mentally or non-mentally.
Okay, wait, hold on, but if you can be human possessing one one of these qualities, then Gardevoir, by definition, one. Mentally she is equal to a human.
> You are a fully functional member of the species homo sapien. This means you do not have any developmental defects (such as mental retardation or missing limbs or blindness etc). If you are incapable of surviving on your own, as a human being, in normal human circumstances, or you are not a homo sapien, you are not human.Okay, great. Now that we have your definition of a human, and, considering that humans are species of primates, would you like to try again to define "animal"?
> I would cease to be human, and I would promptly kill myself because living as a sub-human is the worst possible fate.Odd, considering you've just separated human's existence to mental or non-mental. Mentally you were fully human.
> They were not, no. They were akin to retards, and thus sub-human.Okay then, if early humans WERENT humans then how could EARLY humans possibly turn into REAL HUMANS? because you've just made a hard cut:
> It is entirely based on what you are born as and how you are born.You HAVE to be born as a human. You can't become one with the help of a specific process. If early humans werent "humans that were born with it", there were did "human that were born with it" come from?
Did they just appear out of nowhere? Alien deliery?
