>>54984232>Pokémon can consentDon’t care, that is not the point I am making. A relationship between a human and a Pokémon being consensual is irrelevant to me.
>FanonOkay by that logic zero humans in the Pokémon world show zero sexual interest in any Pokémon outside of the ancient past where humans and Pokémon used to be the same thing. However, you and I know that actual humans do lust after Pokémon. If the humans in Pokemon were allowed to behave like actual people, there would be quite a few noticeable changes in that world.
But yes these hypothetical laws are fanon, so is having sex with Pokémon.
>You aren’t addressing the root cause of why humans would chose to have sex with Pokémon And? Most laws don’t address the root cause of societal issues yet many of them have existed for hundreds of years despite of that.
>These laws wouldn’t magically stop humans having sex with Pokémon Agreed but it would accomplish something else very important. It would prevent people from publicly advocating for said relationships without facing criminal prosecution. This would greatly halt the normalization of fucking Pokémon, this leading to a far fewer amount of people partaking in it. You can see how when western countries decriminalized homosexuality, far far more people starting to have gay sex since it was know a topic that can be spoken about freely and openly. Of course I don’t think laws would completely eliminate an activity, criminals always exist. But most people do not want to be criminals, so having laws against undesirable behaviors is very beneficial.
>>54984240Alright you are just sperging out here. No one but the voices in your head said they wanted to abuse Pokémon in this thread (yet). Also just to be autistic, the comment you are referring to was at the end of my post, so it’s not an INSTANT ad-hominem.
