>>55040729>My point is that you underestimate the knowledge of instructed people from 200 years agoAnon, if the rudimentary technology already existed 200 years before his time then of course the idea of a rocket would have as well but you couldn't go back and ask them to describe what a smartphone is to you because it's beyond their understanding of technology. That's the point.
The paradoxes are a level of technology beyond the scope of what someone 200 years ago could conceptualise.
>Time Travel, just explained in the most retarded, convoluted way and leaving lots of plot holes and things up to interpretation instead of writing a solid plotline.Look, at this point it's just easier to admit that you haven't played the game because if your "plot holes" are anything like the ones mentioned already then it's not a plot hole but your lack of knowledge.
>Even themselves ackowledge it doesn't make much sense through Arven, Case in point, Arven never said it doesn't make sense. He said its weird that the paradoxes appeared in the book when it was the time machine that originally brought them to the present.
Saying something is weird isn't the same as saying it doesn't make sense for starters and then there's the fact that he doesn't even talk about the idea of time travel but rather the time paradox.
>but it's better not to think so hard about these things and just accept them And that's exactly how you ended up at the wrong conclusion of imagination.
I don't even understand why you're still trying to argue when it's been settled as time travel anyway.
