>>55590332>I’ve been asking you to substantiate an argument you never madeIt’s YOU who is claiming it’s LESS monstrous as is, even though it already changes significantly from a sea lion into a sea lion otter hybrid samurai esque monster thing with completely different anatomy. Its you who is supposed to prove that making it bipedal would somehow make it MORE monstrous instead of dodging that statement, which (You) made.
>>55590385>neither do wrestlersHumans are primary bipeds, retard
>platigrade makes sense for the themeDigitigrade makes sense for the animal element though, adding to cohesion.
Even ignoring that, the only reason you think it does is because that’s the human anatomy of a foot. By that logic it should literally just be a human wrestler in every anatomical way. Is this your argument?
>the identity was lostExplain, retard.
>now it’s just an animalIt’s still incredibly different from any animal and has many things about it that are thematic and yet monstrous, while sniffing the shitty fursona trend. It’s the best of both worlds.
>themes should be in-your-face and subtlety is LE BAD lmao>there’s no benefit to preventing the series from turning into a furfag haven and a transition away from creature design towards character OC design>those incineroar improvements and base samurott are just animals somehowProve all of these to be the case, because so far you have not.
>if I ignore the substantiation it doesn’t existThe Pokemon world shouldn’t breaking immersion and believability. This is common fucking sense. It was also never stated by any dev that fursuits are the goal when designing a Pokemon. There are what you asked me for a source for, which is proving a negative. How about (You) find me a source of a dev stating they wanna design fursuits as being any sort of priority for the franchise, as well as any of them suggesting that the Pokemon world needs to break any illusions?
