>>55662650>if I say it doesn't exist it doesn't existanyone can scroll up and see that you're speaking bullshit
>this has no reason to exist, even though it provides more of this other thing that I think is a good featureBrainlet logic
>sperging out strawmanningNo. I said seasons allowed for more battles. I never said it's the only way. All I said was that if there was a hypothetical Gen 5 in an alternate universe without the seasons feature, it would be worse because it would have less battles as a direct result. I brought this up specifically because you said you value more battles in the game.
>should just change everytime you beat himHow is this better? The teams are specifically themed around the seasons.
>could be post gameHow is this better? It provides less variety and now Twist Mountain would be permanently snowed in which makes no sense. Seasons would make it better because no appearance and layout is permanent, increasing replayability.
>HGSS limited their gym leader rematchesI never said this. Again, you keep seeming to suggest that battles can only be added in your preferred way of adding them. HGSS doesn't have season-based teams like N does. Removing these teams from Gen 5 is a limit. Yes, they could have still added more battles elsewhere, and they did, but why does that diminish the battles they added under the umbrella of functional seasons?
>cut the """pointless""" mechanic and add more battlesAnon, be rational. B2W2 added battles on both fronts. Therefore, it's a good game because it added many battles that you like (not tied to seasons) and has many battles that I like as well (tied to seasons).
