>>55759638>Yeah bro I love how you made Poison and Steel complete dogshit because you felt the need to remove Fairy for no reason.Steel would still be incredibly strong, easily a top 3 type, if Fairy were removed. If it's not strong "enough", maybe give it back its Dark resistance and then give Dark back Pursuit to keep Ghost in check too.
As for Poison, it's still not good even with Fairy around. If you really want to buff its offensive power, make it SE against Water. Water could use the nerf and Poison could use the buff. It's pretty easy to justify, too, what with a relatively small amount of pollutants being able to completely BTFO entire aquatic ecosystems, not to mention the mercury poisoning going on in the oceans.
>They can already easily switch in on Frostbite because Frostbite already doesn't exist. You're doing nothing solving a problem you invented.Yes, but Frostbite would be a check on other offensive types that wouldn't exist for Ice. Just like Fire type physical attackers get a huge bonus over non-Fire types because they're immune to Burn, Ice types would get a huge bonus of non-Ice types because they can't be Frostbitten.
>You think people use Fairy and Ice types to hit Dragons super effectively?Iron Valiant is one of the strongest and most commonly used Pokemon in standard play. Fairy has been one of the top 3 dominant types in OU since its inception even despite there being so few (good) Fairy types.
As for Ice? It would be if not for Fairy type being better at the role of Dragon slaying.
>They already have enough ins if you're actually good at the game and know how it works beyond "durff fire beat grass"You're insane if you think Ice types have ins currently. Even when Chien Pao and Baxcalibur were in OU, bringing them in was their only drawback. It's hard to bring in Ice types when they eat massive shit from hazards and don't have any resistances. If your Ice type isn't immediately threatening a KO upon entry, it's entirely useless.
