>>55778815Keep the release scheduele at 3 years.
Release a spinoff game every year.
Order would be.
Mainline, spinoff, spinoff, Mainline, spinoff, spinoff.
And sprinkle in dlc between them.
Open up 3-4 more studios to work on spinoffs and other games.
Give the spinoffs their own pokemon to add to make people interested.
Each games development time now goes from 3 years to 4-5 because they now have more groups working on games in a cycle.
Drop the open world shit, focus more on making a good looking world that makes you want to explore.
Introduce a new game, Pokemon zoo/ranch/whatever Which works as the new pokemon bank, it updates for free with every new gen or new batch released. And it's bundled in with the nintendo online subscription.
It's basically a zoo you can explore and watch your pokemon idle around. Graphically it doesn't matter what they look like you could use the rumble art style for all I care.
Bring back the nat dex in games, you don't have to catch any of the nat dex to fill your completion dex in each game, they don't even need dex entries. Even ban them from online multiplayer for that gen's bracket.
Pkhex feature.
Add into the previously mentioned zoo thing. A way to make the best a pokemon can be with changeable Iv/ev etc. When you unlock a pokemon for the bank you unlock it's moves to, so when you deposit a bulbasaur with a bunch of egg moves, they become available for you to use in the zoo library or to teach the pokemon. Along with mix and matching ev/iv.
If they insist of continuing the open world trend for games can we not randomly get a legendary pokemon that nobody seems to be concerned about. Can we just climb the fucking walls ourselves botw style since they're stealing everything else.
