>>55790154You're back to seethe some more, I see.
Doubles is fotm. No history, no future. Don't pretend like there was ever discussion of doubles here.In all seriousness, though, I wonder why doubles isn't organically popular the way singles is. No one cares about doubles outside of the current iteration of VGC. Why is this? Is it the fault of campaignshitters? Or maybe it's the fault of the ashnime?
When I think of pokemon battles, I think of 6v6 singles. Pick "a" lead, not pick two leads. Send out "a" pokemon, not send out two pokemon. Even the TCG has only one active pokemon at a time, does it not?
Doubles seems somewhat intriguing to me, but I have as little personal desire to learn any doubles format as I have to learn weird archaic smoggie formats like gen 1 or 2 OU.
