>>55804566>original argument:>XY has the smallest new roster of any genThat wasn't your original argument. You had to change your original argument because you realized it made games you like look bad.
>(statement that reduces the actual content) It doesn't reduce the actual content though.
>No one else's fault but yoursGame Freak could have just made a good game on the first try like they did with XY.
>Holy shitpostNot an argument. Concession accepted.
>Because it was obvious.If it was obvious you wouldn't have said something completely different.
>Making it a new form of an existing pokemonAnd a new Pokemon, yes.
>Holy shitpostNot an argument. Concession accepted.
>Because it was the obvious full wording of the common argumentIf it was obvious you wouldn't have said something completely different.
>Pt is just a special edition DP anonHow do I play BF in DP?
>>MUH LITERALISMBasic reading comprehension isn't "literalism".
>Now address XY having the smallest new roster of any generationThere were already at least two posts addressing it.
>>55801416 >>55802558>Same generation thoughSame series though
>So there's no criteria to pair just them together without lumping in the whole series as well, got it.Yes. Exactly like what you're doing with BW and BW2.
>>55804616>Because the original anon was a fucking retardI'm glad we agree. So then why are you so desperate to change what his actual argument was?
>His true argument can be inferred in subsequent posts.No, what can be inferred from his subsequent posts is that he instantly realized he made a terrible argument and had to make a different one.
>Really? A new mechanic makes a totally new game?Yes.
>No, no I'm notYes, yes you are.
>They're in the same regionThey're in the same series
>Nice argument thereYeah, it's about as good as your argument trying to lump BW2 intro BW.
