>>56159332>We all know a Piplup can’t beat a Garchomp with a simple BubbleAnd again with "it is does not count cause I don't like it". Again really weak take. Btw do you then really believe that pokemons could use only 4 moves and take turns when fighting, after all "only games count"? You really cornered yourself with this take, ngl.
>I already made mine.Gasligthing is cool and all but then sadly for you did make and argument would not change previuos posts.
>there’s no reason to get defensive over porn of digital animalsThen why you are so defensive , lol? Making entire thread and sitting in it for hours makes me believe you take this debates pretty personally. You really should stop making takes which could be so easily turned and used against you.
>The pokemon can’t consentSaying this again and again without actual arguments, truly you are the finest "warrior against religious doctrine", lol.
>Genuinely try to think of one organic situation in which a Pokemon wants to do human adult stuff with youReally, trolling by stupidity? Guess I can indulge in it a little to see with what you'll come next. Why would humans do "human adult stuff" excluding procreation? The desire to please someone close to you? To be as close as possible to the most important being in reality, to show your trust while in one of the most defenseless situations both physically and psychologically, to be together, doing objectively one of the most pleasant activities? Or will you continue to convince me that sex for no reason is one of the most intimate acts between individuals?
>has Pokemon act like glorified furries in which they’re independent sapient beingsSo independent sapient beings == glorified furrie? What did you even want to say? Or is this a dumb question about why people mostly like humanoid mammals with tactilely pleasing skin? One must really wonder then...
>>56159442Forbidden for plebs allowed for patricians obviously.
