>>58498068No, that is inanity. Context exist for a reason and you can't wave away how Pokemon are conceptualized because you want to have your little inane groomer fantasies.
Pokemon will never acknowledge your brand of inanity. Never ever, instead the series will do as it always has since Tajiri's concept of what a Pokemon materialized back in Gen I. That being a Pokemon is a friendly critter and one that takes up the role of a pet instead of a person.
Verily indeed, I can type out all the little things the series does to push this view and the fact that within lore Pokemon and what a person is exist as two separate concepts. With this in mind all that matters not because that's normal in the realm of fiction, What matters here is that Pokemon is a children's franchise, the Pokemon are innocent, magical critters that want to be friends in the same way people perceive pets in the real world.
This series does NOT need perverts to taint the series with their ugly, inane groomer fantasies especially one as innocent as Pokemon. It would be better if every pokegroomer in this board put their creativity and energy into something more productive like playing soccer or going to church.
Stop having inane groomer fantasies involivng magical critters from a children's series. Cease making inane threads like these that lack media literacy.
