>>30758072>I'm not cuckposting. I was talking about a hypothetical situation where a single "fan" sweeps her off her feet and takes her and everyone claps teehee..
>I was simply taking your premise to it[s:lit] logical conclusion.Except that's wrong. She interacts with hundreds of fans through these events. Your logic is that she doesn't "interact with enough fans", but if we take that to its "logical conclusion", then there is no form of interaction that is enough. Streaming? Well what about the thousands of her fans who aren't awake, or are at work, or busy in some other way or just don't have internet access when she streams? VOD views are always way higher than stream views, so you can assume the majority of people who end up viewing the stream don't catch it live. I guess it doesn't count then, because she's not interacting with "the majority of fans".
>You claim this is parasocial and so it shouldn't count as a direct interaction for some reasonIt is, by definition, not a direct interaction. Not "for some reason", but by definition. I still think, just like fan meet-ups, live concerts, and twitter interactions, this is a valid form of interaction, and still COUNTS even THOUGH it's not "direct". You were the one who started with this "if it's not direct it doesn't count" with the Twitter argument.
