>>67143638>And your idea of substantiate is to provide with some fuck knows what website's dataAnd all you have is "because I said so". How is that any better?
>Says the guy who thought I'm the OP. So much for proper nutrition.Only the OP could be this butthurt over being proven wrong. If not, then rejoice! You have at least one other person in the world, who is an utterly, irredeemable moron just like you.
>Don't have to imagine, it's right here with usStill doesn't change the fact that this argument is basically 1 "point" versus 12. How does it feel to lose to a "unicorn"?
