>>62998618Wrong and wrong.
Sorry (You) are just too fucking stupid and unevolved to take the hint and notice that MY answer actually works while yours does not, but it's not like I expected any better from the mentally/socially retarded dipshit cripple who is genuinely braindead to the point that he thinks the simple act of making ANY analogy between literally anything and anything else is some kind of low-effort, low-IQ trump card crutch that is magically beyond criticism or refutation - conveniently focusing on specific, particular traits which make concepts similar while sidestepping the ways in which they DIFFER and which SPECIFICALLY cause the analogy to break down in THIS SPECIFIC CASE, regardless of how much generalization and handwaving you do
Oh, but so long as ANY two conceivable properties or characteristics are shared in common between any two objects or concepts, then you can still make "a comparison" between them, which means they must be logically equivalent to each other - so sayeth the cognitively impaired schizophrenic who is TOTALLY socially competent, as proven by the tantrum he threw on /ggg/ over not understanding how analogies work while pretending it was literally everybody else who didn't get it
I bet you can't comprehend the concept of a "hypothetical conditional". Promptly inhale chlorine gas
