>>41840300/2434/ vote:
1. Yay, I never see an issue with placement unless it is totally ridiculous.
2. Yay, voiced my support for this already. (
>>41696368)
3. Yay, voiced my support for this already. (
>>41696368)
4. Yay, solely because of the trial period. I have to agree with all the others that the idea this will fix everything is silly, but to quote Koboker: «i would rather see something tried out to fix the problems that to sit around and think its just fine because it is not just fine.» If that means we try something new, then I support that because I am not happy whatsoever with the state of the thread at all.