Quoted By:
rep are you gonna vote this round?
Here are my thoughts:
>1. Agree. Climate's perfect for (((them))). Not that many regions with Levent-like climates left in the world.
>2. Abstain.
>3. Abstain.
>4. Agree. Absolutely needs a trial period. Although I think the spirit of it is admirable, Kobokek said most of the things I wanted to say. The region system is very redundant. I think it should only be applied to decisions directly related to the region/continent in question. And for the suggested benefit of promoting regional cooperation between anons I think the current system, in that there is no system already works okay. The problem is the imagined groups that schizos and anons themselves conjured up. The tiered system is also something that I don't think should be an actual rule. Again the current representative and loremaster system already does that! Though I agree anons could explain their history with the thread they are writing for better so people could trust them. Since this project have transformed much from the pioneer era, where almost threads actually have participation and discussions in them that can verify an anon's identity. Being more transparent this way could make anons more trusting.
The proposal needs a lot of ironing out though I'm not opposed to a trial to see if it can help with things. My opinion on most of the things wrong with the thread is still just don't bite bait lol and don't throw insults at each other willy nilly. But if the system can be proven to work while not impeding things too much I will welcome it. I might be interested in rewriting the current bylaws and intro doc to specify the "roles" in the thread, as an alternative to consider after we have finished with the trial.
If you are not gonna vote you okay with transferring it to me for this week?
