>>31826676Don't worry about the old guys intent, he only wrote a stub.
I think its kind of retarded to expect a new rep to try and figure out the intent of the guy who wrote a stub 4 months ago before dipping.
Its extra work that could dissuade new people from joining, and it seems kind of backwards to put so much weight on the words of the guy who came first when all he did was write a stub: chances are the new rep is going to end up writing more lore than them, and might have more interesting and in depth ideas of their own.
If the new rep wants to respect the old reps ideas and use them as a jumping off point they can, I just think its kind of silly expect new reps to start catalogue diving to figure out what direction a stub writer planned on having the nation go in.