>>74494931Here is a wider view of UUUM stocks. Whatever bet they had on "accelerate" crashed and burned along the way.
Anon at
>>74494614 is making a hyperfocused analysis on what's happening but the reality is
>there is no "get rich quick scheme" for content creationonly "slow and steady" and the stock prices are starting to reflect that instead of the exuberant expectation of growth of the previous year.