>>5214585Anon, thanks for being blunt with us. Been gone for hours and I was pleasantly surprised to see this level of conversation on /vt/.
>>5213194I too would've liked to see a response from a 2Dlolicon that did not consider themselves a pedophile, and I'm on the opposite side of this argument [nothing wrong with 2D lolicons]. Will still defend them because it at least it gave people like pedoanon an outlet...
