>>40026865>if it were just remains, it might not work. it might actually be better to get the concept of kin from inorganic processes, like the concept of the fibonacci sequence and factorials as it relates to multiplying one into two into 4 etc. so long as you showed the hierarchy between what came first, and what came last. the key detail is in how something produces more of itself, which then produces more of itself ad nauseum.Can you explain what this might look like in practice, and how it would tie back to the specific kin group of relevance?
>>no what? there was a lot in that comment, and ending the discussion here doesn't resolve anything, especially if you haven't fully comprehended my suggestions or requests enough to know whether or not you might actually want them. plus, continuing the conversation could lead to the realization of other things that you didn't know you wanted, even if you never agree to any of the suggestions i made so far.You know anon, discussions of high level concepts can be quite intense in terms of mental energy. It's not an issue for you, and I can sorta swing it in moderate doses, but if an anon is ready to move on from a conversation, I think they're free to do so. I don't think it's anything personal, those conversations can just be a bit demanding.