>>48382372What's really hilarious about that is the guy literally just made most of the data up, and what he didn't was incompatible. (i.e. comparing the sales of items that had been available for 3 weeks to items that were only on sale for 1 week.)
Yet numberfags still ate it up and believed it regardless. If somebody really wanted to, they could make up graphs that say literally anything and /#/ would take it as gospel.