>>90999787 That’s not it. See
>>90999770, their biggest misconception is
>1) that the Hololive audience is a “brand loyalty” audience>2) that Holostars are part of the same company as Hololive, hence part of the same brand, hence “deserving” of the same love and support the Hololive audience give their girlsFirst part is a misconception because the “Hololive audience” is an “optical illusion”, the emergent property of the audience of each of the girls and the shared content, style and relationships between the girls.
It’s not because of the company, it’s because each of the girls and their “shared universe” and points of contact.
Second point is a misconception because the connection is too tangential to be of any significance. They’re (Hololive and Holostars) as far apart in branding, strategy, style and content as YUMENOS and VSPO. There is no commonality.
Long story short: homo audience wishes their precious boys would catch some of the love the audience gives to the girls, but that won’t happen
