>>39283188>over a longer period of time, maybe.See, this is something that we would need to discuss as well. Like, let's say for example I were to create a /nasa/ thread once or twice a week, and it would get anons that would post in it before being bumped off. Would that be enough of a reason to consider the country(I almost wrote nation again ffs) stable and one that should be represented in world?
>i just think we should at least technically count as a nation still, i guess, we've had similar circumstances that only really differ in intensity.NOW THAT I HAVE THE TERMINOLOGY RIGHT yes, as a nation most definitely. But as a united country, I still don't agree, if we are to represent your situation truthfully. You might establish a country many times over a short period of time, but each time a janny swoops in and purges the group responsible for it's creation, and the survivors scatter to the winds. So you are stuck in this predicament where you can't declare to the world "We are /meat/!" or you risk erasure. But that also doesn't stop the people from interacting with other countries, just not on a national level. So you wouldn't have a diplomat represent the entirety of /meat/ on foreign soil, but maybe just a small piece of it, a few united groups/tribes that are /meat/ in all but name. Honestly, the in world lore implications and paths you could take are for you to consider, I'm just throwing ideas out there.
