>>33274575I appreciate you concern but I am afraid we're going to have to just trust in the anons sometime, at least until we can find a better way of having people to vet out lore that an actual member of the thread/fanbase would see as a misrepresentation.
I can also think of more workable ways of preventing what you worry my system has an issue with than the issues I see your system having. For example if someone shows up whose an actual resident of the thread/actually watched the vtuber shows up and finds the previous reps lore to be wrong/disagreeable then they can alert us and their home thread and get it all retconned or modified. We get a new rep who knows what they're doing and the old rep gets booted out.
Applying the same scrutiny to your system it could produce heaps of dubious lore that would either harm future writing or could lead to masses of destructive retcons that would (since people tend to tie their lore into their lore) effect multiple nations at once, as anons would have no one to make sure what they're writing is accurate beyond surface analysis.
It could also make power playing much easier to get away with since we no longer have authorities on a threads foreign policy: under your system the only thing stopping me from writing both sides of a treaty with /wah/ and making it canon would be the gentlemans agreement that it would be kind of shitty of me to do it, and there'd not technically be any hard way of proving that what I did was wrong.
