>>34621846> first pointTechnically true but at some point, given enough data, you won't be able to say it's any different from what a human does, pulling from what they learned to make something new
> second pointThat applies to human art too
AI art is really in its baby stages, and even then we already have really good stuff like pic rel. Keep in mind this technology is like 2 years old. It is far, FAR too soon to dismiss as "it's shit and will never take over anything"