>>1006095Oh yeah and just to not sound like I'm being political myself it should be kinda obvious I oppose those who try to spin facts to try to push some means-tested and exploitative interpretation of the science that just conveniently profits some large multinational corporation.
Stuff like the hysteria around nuclear power or carbon taxes or paper straws. The kinda bullshit that was only thought up as a compromise between science and corporate/lobbyist greed. When they try to frame those positions as the "ethical" stance or say it's the only "reasonable compromise" it's just further damaging discourse and the layman's understanding of science.
>>1006321Great point anon. Facts can be deliberately framed in a way that is misleading. You see this all the time on any large social media site, headlines will always be extremely sensationalized. But, at the very least you can combat that by providing more information if someone is actually interested in facts. If their position is set in stone from seeing a headline then they probably had that position beforehand and just wanted the validation.
Hell this is something that happens on this very board with rrats being formed out of tiny events that get built into elaborate lies.
Ayame doesn't wear a diaper!! 