>>15078151All talk people do in the thread yeah, but you could have even more of that in the thread. More on-topic posts. Discussions about the game can happen here instead of the aggie, that's another point. I feel like having such discussions archived is important. Not only that, you can go into more detail, post images easier, think longer, etc. Game discussion, when done in the aggie (and it is somewhat common), is harder, less productive, quickly forgotten. I can easily pull up an old post of mine here e.g.
>>14921099Keeping stuff like that in the thread is preferred, but when the aggie is open it's likely to be discussed there
Unless it's started here first, in the case of the post I referenced.
Another issue, all the people who don't visit the aggie will miss out on discussions of any kind. The majority of the active-in-the-thread players visit the aggie, yes. But for those who do not, they are barred (and yes, not forcibly before you use that argument) from discussions which they may have taken part in. Far more people browse the thread than the aggie, and far more people are likely to join the game if they see the thread alive, well, and thinking
