>>63941250See that's the problem with the idea just being incompatible with our current economic system. Automation ideally eases up and frees up humans to be more independent. Capitalism requires humans have labor to survive. So one or the other will have to go in the future for human survival. Most jobs aren't essential statistically, so as automation improves, the capitalistic nature of modern economics becomes detrimental to human wellbeing instead. Universal Basic income with the opportunity to learn and work or research in specialized fields and or art/media/entertainment is the closest thing to a working compromise.
>>63941316Same, but for human households androids are likely because they'd be designed to work in the parameters of human life. Like how kitchens are specifically human spaces with how cabinets are laid out.
>>63941345I meant the point of automation in the first place.
