>>76997995>Why did she assume you supported trump if you only did a security detail for the organization, though?In fairness it's a reasonable inference to make in my case, considering I'd previously gone on record in her class as being staunchly, unequivocally opposed to all censorship and executive "regulation" over not just speech, but literally anything
But generally yeah. As
>>76998139 points out they probably wouldn't hire someone with Antifa ties, but at two of my coworkers have an explicitly mercenary attitude towards the job. One of them does still does support Trump, and while the other doesn't hate the Trumps or anything, he's more... let's say "ambivalent" towards them
>>76998234I know they do background checks of some sort, not sure exactly what they checked for though
